Due Week 10 and worth 160 points Once a course or training module is developed in an LMS, it is important to see how the

Due Week 10 and worth 160 points Once a course or training module is developed in an LMS, it is important to see how the students or instructors are using the system. Every LMS has ability to produce reports that stakeholders manage, maintain, and improve the learning experience for students and the teaching experience for instructors. You are provided with some reports generated from a course in Blackboard. These reports can indicate if you have any assets that are not engaging learners or if the anticipated time frames to perform tasks are inaccurate. In addition, these reports to create remediation for students and ensure that instructors are performing their jobs. OPEN PDF FILES TO VIEW THE REPORTS  WHICH ARE ATTACHED BELOW!!!!! You will need to ANALYZE THE REPORTS AND RECOMMEND CHANGES TO IMPROVE THE LMS BASED ON YOUR ANALYSIS!!! Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: 1. Summarize your findings and analysis from the reports provided. Determine the main areas that engage students and the main areas that do not. 2. Determine at least two (2) areas that you would like to improve, if you had the authority to make changes to the LMS itself, in order to improve the course or the functionality of the LMS. Provide a rationale for your response. 3. Recommend at least two (2) changes to the LMS that will enhance students’ learning and / or stakeholder’s managing experiences. Provide a rationale for your recommendation. 4. Suggest a targeted report that you wish the LMS could provide for either students or faculty in order to understand student progress, monitor activity, or other interactions with the LMS. Provide a rationale for your response. 5. Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims. 6. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length. c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: · Evaluate assessment tools and capabilities of an LMS. · Design learning assets based on end user or organizational needs. · Use technology and information resources to research issues in technology tools to manage learning. · Write clearly and concisely about issues in technology tools to manage learning using proper writing mechanics. 1. Summarize your findings and   analysis from the reports provided. Determine the main areas that engage   students and the main areas that do not. Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely   summarized your findings and analysis from the reports provided. Did not   submit or incompletely determined the main areas that engage students and the   main areas that do not. Partially summarized your   findings and analysis from the reports provided. Partiallydetermined the main   areas that engage students and the main areas that do not. Satisfactorily summarized your   findings and analysis from the reports provided. Satisfactorily determined   the main areas that engage students and the main areas that do not. Thoroughly summarized your   findings and analysis from the reports provided. Thoroughly determined   the main areas that engage students and the main areas that do not. 2. Determine at least two (2)   areas that you would like to improve, if you had the authority to make   changes to the LMS itself, in order to improve the course or the   functionality of the LMS. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely   determined at least two (2) areas that you would like to improve if you had   the authority to make changes to the LMS itself in order to improve the   course or the functionality of the LMS. Did not submit or incompletely   provided a rationale for your response. Partially determined at least two   (2) areas that you would like to improve if you had the authority to make   changes to the LMS itself in order to improve the course or the functionality   of the LMS. Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily determined at least   two (2) areas that you would like to improve if you had the authority to make   changes to the LMS itself in order to improve the course or the functionality   of the LMS. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response. Thoroughly determined at least two   (2) areas that you would like to improve if you had the authority to make   changes to the LMS itself in order to improve the course or the functionality   of the LMS. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 3. Recommend at least two (2)   changes to the LMS that will enhance students’ learning and / or   stakeholder’s managing experiences. Provide a rationale for your   recommendation. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely   recommended at least two (2) changes to the LMS that will enhance students’   learning and / or stakeholder’s managing experiences. Did not submit or   incompletely provided a rationale for your recommendation. Partially recommended at   least two (2) changes to the LMS that will enhance students’ learning and /   or stakeholder’s managing experiences. Partially provided a rationale   for your recommendation. Satisfactorilyrecommended at least   two (2) changes to the LMS that will enhance students’ learning and / or   stakeholder’s managing experiences. Satisfactorily provided a rationale   for your recommendation. Thoroughlyrecommended at least two   (2) changes to the LMS that will enhance students’ learning and / or   stakeholder’s managing experiences. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your   recommendation. 4. Suggest a targeted report that   you wish the LMS could provide for either students or faculty in order to   understand student progress, monitor activity, or other interactions with the   LMS. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely   suggested a targeted report that you wish the LMS could provide for either   students or faculty in order to understand student progress, monitor   activity, or other interactions with the LMS. Did not submit or incompletely   provided a rationale for your response. Partially suggested a targeted   report that you wish the LMS could provide for either students or faculty in   order to understand student progress, monitor activity, or other interactions   with the LMS. Partially provided a rationale for your response. Satisfactorily suggested a   targeted report that you wish the LMS could provide for either students or   faculty in order to understand student progress, monitor activity, or other   interactions with the LMS. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your   response. Thoroughly suggested a targeted   report that you wish the LMS could provide for either students or faculty in   order to understand student progress, monitor activity, or other interactions   with the LMS. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response. 5. Provide at least three (3)   reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used   previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the   paper’s claims. Weight: 5% No references provided. Does not meet the required number   of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required   references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required   references; all references high quality choices. 6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and   Formatting Weight: 5% Serious and persistent errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Partially free of errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Mostly free of errors in grammar,   spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Error free or almost error free   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. 7. Appropriate use of APA in-text   citations and reference section Weight: 5% Lack of in-text citations and / or   lack of reference section. In-text citations and references   are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. Most in-text citations and   references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA   style. In-text citations and references   are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in   APA style. 8. Information Literacy /   Integration of Sources Weight: 5% Serious errors in the integration   of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use   in-text citations. Sources are partially integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are mostly integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are consistently   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing. 9. Clarity and Coherence of   Writing Weight: 5% Information is confusing to the   reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support   ideas. Information is partially clear   with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is mostly clear and   generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is provided in a   clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that   logically support ideas.

Give us your instructions.
Select the type of service you need: writing, calculations, or programming. We’ve created an intuitive order form that tells you what information to enter and where, so make sure to fill out each required field. Also, make your requirements as specific as possible. Don’t rush! Take your time and explain everything in detail how it works.

Proceed to checkout and enter your credit card details or PayPal login, how to pay. Follow the payment provider’s instructions to confirm the transaction.
Now your order is in our system! We’ll start processing it right away.

Place Your Order

Contact Us

Frequently asked questions
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account.

Is there a possibility of plagiarism in my completed order?

We complete each paper from scratch and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check it for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism detection systems that are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.

We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can certainly get your money back in several cases. You can receive a full refund if you have paid for your order twice or if you have placed two identical orders. In case your paper was late or the quality of the paper does not correspond to your expectations, you will get compensation for these issues.

Do you keep a database of pre-written essays?

No, we do not have such a database. All papers you order from us are written from scratch. This means your paper is unique and has never been published before—neither will it be published after we deliver it to you.

 

When will my custom paper be done?

While placing an order with WritersHub, you can choose a period of time within which a paper should be delivered to you. The countdown until the specified deadline starts automatically from the moment we receive your payment in our system. For example, if you pay for your order at 6pm on Monday and choose a 3-day delivery option, you will receive your custom paper by 6pm on Thursday.

Remember that a writer needs a sufficient amount of time in order to conduct thorough research. Therefore, please choose the most suitable deadline when you place an order. Moreover, the later you need your paper to be delivered to you, the cheaper it will be. Thus, you will be able to save your money while your writer will have enough time to work on your order and ensure its quality.

Make sure you upload all the additional materials at the very beginning. If you fail to do that, the deadline for your order will be postponed as well.

I haven’t received my custom paper by the deadline. What should I do?

Let us know immediately about that. You can do it by writing a message on Facebook or email us. Our support manager will carefully examine your order and will assist you with it right away. The reasons for late delivery may vary from time to time. It can happen that you have entered a wrong email address or your spam filter does not allow you to receive emails from us. It is also possible that the writer is waiting for your reply and can not continue working without your assistance, or we are checking the work for plagiarism. Whatever the case may be, contact us if you have any problems with getting your order on time.