To prepare for this Discussion, read the case study “St. Dismas Assisted Living Facility Project Action Plan3,” which is in your course text Project…

To prepare for this Discussion, read the case study “St. Dismas Assisted Living Facility Project Action Plan—3,” which is in your course text Project Management in Practice on pages 193-196.Then, using either the trial edition of Microsoft Project 2010 that is included with the course text or using a free download from Project Manager at www.projectmanager.com, create a Gantt chart for the construction phase of the project. Your Gantt chart should include allof the data that is detailed in the action plan for facility construction on page 192.Note: If you need guidance in using either the Microsoft Project or www.projectmanager.com project management tools, please review the software-specific tutorials and other user resources that were provided for your reference as part of this week’s Optional Resources.By Day 4, post a comprehensive response to the following:Based on the project schedule that you have generated in the Gantt chart, when do you estimate that the project will be completed if construction starts in November, as the Board has requested? When do you estimate that the project will be completed if construction starts in March, as the construction project manager has recommended? In support of your estimation, post the file of your Gantt chart along with your Discussion response.Based on your estimations for completion, do you think it will be possible for the construction team to meet the scheduling constraints set by the Board? Why or why not? Explain your recommendation in the context of PMBOK-defined time management principles and practices.What is your recommendation for addressing the scheduling discrepancy between the time frame that the Board wants and what the construction team says it can deliver? When would the project be completed based on your recommendation and what does the construction team need to do to meet this milestone? Again, be sure to explain your recommendation in the context of PMBOK-defined time management principles and practices.For your Week 4 Discussion, answer ONLY the course-specific questions listed above. DO NOT reference or answer any of the questions that are included in the course text as part of a numbered list at the end of the case study.Question: St. Dismas Assisted Living Facility—1 St. Dismas Medical Center, an urban, nonprofit, 450 bed reh…St. Dismas Assisted Living Facility—1St. Dismas Medical Center, an urban, nonprofit, 450 bed rehabilitation hospital began tosee a significant decline in admissions. St. Dismas’ mission focuses on inpatient andoutpatient rehabilitation of the severely injured and catastrophically ill. While the patientcensus varied from month to month, it appeared to the St. Dismas Board of Trustees thatthe inpatient population was slowly but steadily declining. The hospital’s marketresearchers reported that fewer people were being severely injured due to the popularityof seat belts and bicycle/motorcycle helmets. In order to get a handle on the future of the organization, the Board, and theCEO, Fred Splient M.D. called for a major strategicplanning effort to take place.In January 1999, St. Dismas held a planning retreat to identify future opportunities. Theoutcome of the retreat was that the Medical Center needed to focus its efforts around two major strategic initiatives. The first, a short run initiative, was to be more costeffective in the delivery of inpatient care. The second, a long-run strategy, was to develop newprograms and services that would capitalize on the existing, highly competent rehabilitation therapy staff and St. Dismas’s excellent reputation in the region.At the time of the retreat, Fred Splient’s parents were living with him and his family. Fredwas an active member of the “sandwich generation.” His parents were aging anddeveloping many problems common to the geriatric populace. Their increased medicalneeds were beginning to wear on Fred and his family. It crossed Fred’s mind that lifemight be more pleasant if the hospital Board approved an expansion of the Medical Center’s campus to include an assisted living facility.In March 1999, Fred had his Business Development team prepare a rough estimate of thepotential return on investment of an assisted living facility. He asked the team to identifydifferent options for facility construction and the associated costs. The team also did acomplete competitive analysis and examined the options for services to be offered basedon St. Dismas’s potential population base and catchment area. The Business Developmentteam visited several facilities across the country. The team also interviewed companiesthat could oversee the design, building, and operation of the facility for St. Dismas. Thedevelopment team produced a preliminary business plan based on the recommendedstructure for the facility, estimated capital expenditure needs, estimated income fromoperation of the facility, as well as projected revenues to other Medical Center programsresulting from the facility’s population.The plan was presented at the May 1999 meeting of the Board of Trustees. Fred Splientand his team introduced the Board to the concept of opening an assisted living facility onSt. Dismas’s campus. The facility would be set up as a for-profit subsidiary of the Medical Center so that it could generate a profit and not be subjected to the strict guidelines of the hospital’s accrediting agencies. As a subsidiary organization, however, the Board would still have control.The chosen facility design was a freestanding apartment-like facility with a sheltered connection to the Hospital for access to the kitchen and hospital services. The facility would have 100 units with 15 to 30 of the units classified as “heavy-assisted” and built to code to house the physically and medically disabled. The rest of the units would be “light-assisted,” larger apartments. The population would be approximately 110 to 150residents, with most being single occupants rather than couples.The light-assisted apartments could hold residents who required only minor medical andsocialinterventions. The residents of the heavy-assisted section would have more medicalneeds and would require assistance getting around. The Business Development teamrecommended this type of programming model, because many assisted living facilitieswere erected across the country, but few had a medical focus and offered the types ofservices that St. Dismas could offer—physical and occupational therapy programs, andbehavior management programs to name a few.The Board was assured that the facility would meet the strategic initiative of a growingbusiness. The business plan projected an immediate increase in the number of referrals tothe outpatient therapy programs. Another projected deliverable of the project was toenable St. Dismas to strengthen its focus on reimbursable preventive and wellnessprograms for the healthier geriatric population. The project’s longer term goal was toincrease the census in the hospital’s inpatient units by having a location where peoplecould age in place until they were in need of hospitalization, and then such a facilitywould be right next door.Depending on the exact size of the apartments, their equipment, and the actual ratio ofheavy-to light-assisted units, Fred estimated that the entire project would cost between$8,500,000 and $11,000,000 for the facility construction. That estimate included the costof land, furnishings, and a sheltered connection to the hospital. When up and running, itwas estimated that the net income would range between $9,000 and $12,000 per unit per year. The team estimated the net cash flow for the entire project to be around $1,500,000per year.Fred requested the Board to approve the concept and allow his team to prepare a proforma plan to the Board for approval. The plan would include a recommended design forboth heavy-and light-assisted apartments. It would also include all costs of land,construction, furnishings, and staffing. Income estimates would be included and would beconservatively biased. A timetable would also be included.The Board conducted several executive sessions, and by the middle of May voted toapprove the concept. They approved the architectural-construction-management firm recommended by the team, and they requested Splient to proceed with developing a complete project plan. The Board appointed two Board members to sit on Fred’s planning group.In June, Dr. Splient gathered his executive team together and presented the projectmission, and scope. He reported that the board had approved a small budget to financethe planning process. The Board also stipulated that construction could not begin untilafter the November 1999 city elections because two of the Board Members were runningin that election, one for a city council seat and one as a county commissioner. The Boardalso stated that they would like a plan that would allow the facility to open by July 2000,as research has shown that many adult children find the summer the easiest time to assisttheir parents in finding an alternative to independent living arrangements. The CEO andexecutive team were now confident that they were ready to launch the project to plan,build, and open an assisted living facility at St. Dismas.A few days later, Fred decided that it was time to set up the team that would takeResponsibility for what he called the ALF project. He quickly decided to include thefollowing staff at the launch meeting:Chief Financial Officer (CFO)Vice President of Business Development and MarketingRehab Services Medical DirectorConstruction Project Manager for capital facilities projectsChief Operations Officer (COO) (nursing, facilities, food services, andhousekeeping)Director of Information ServicesDirector of Support Services (central supply, purchasing, and security)Two members of the Board of Trustees, one with construction experience and theother a probable electee to the city council.Even though the department directors from Support Services and Information Serviceswould not be involved until later, Fred decided to include them from the beginning. Fredknew some members of his team had a tendency to become obstacles to progress if theyfelt left out.Fred named the group the ALF Project Steering Committee and held the first meeting.Fred presented his vision for the facility. He told the group that he personally would bemanaging this project. He led a discussion of all the major steps that must be included inthe project plan, and asked each team member to identify the areas for which they wouldaccept responsibility. The hospital’s Construction Project Manager took responsibility forthe construction of the facility, and the COO volunteered to oversee the building design,as well as define the needs for food services, housekeeping, staffing, and policy andprocedure development. The CFO agreed to develop the budgets for each area of theproject as well as the operating budget for the facility. The CFO also agreed to create thepayroll and accounting systems necessary to operate the facility.The IS director accepted responsibility to define and set up all the telecommunicationsand information system needs of the facility. The VP of Business Development agreed tocreate a preliminary marketing plan, and a communication package for the communityand hospital staff. In addition, she discussed organizing a major ground breaking event.The Medical Director said that he would design an assessment tool for determiningresidents’ level of medical needs upon moving in to the facility. He felt this was the firststep in defining what clinical services should be offered to residents. Fred told the teamthat he would develop the management structure for the new facility and work with in-house counsel to identify all governmental regulations as well as all industry standardsthat pertain to an assisted living facility and govern the facility’s practices. Splient gavethe team two months to come back with their detailed action plans for their areas ofresponsibility.

Give us your instructions.
Select the type of service you need: writing, calculations, or programming. We’ve created an intuitive order form that tells you what information to enter and where, so make sure to fill out each required field. Also, make your requirements as specific as possible. Don’t rush! Take your time and explain everything in detail how it works.

Proceed to checkout and enter your credit card details or PayPal login, how to pay. Follow the payment provider’s instructions to confirm the transaction.
Now your order is in our system! We’ll start processing it right away.

Place Your Order

Contact Us

Frequently asked questions
Is your service confidential?

When you place an order with our company, we ask you to provide us with such personal information as your name, phone number, and email address. We need this data to keep you updated on the important things related to your order or account.

Is there a possibility of plagiarism in my completed order?

We complete each paper from scratch and in order to make you feel safe regarding its authenticity, we check it for plagiarism before its delivery. To do that, we use our in-house software, which can find not only copy-pasted fragments but even paraphrased pieces of text. Unlike popular plagiarism detection systems that are used by most universities (e.g. Turnitin.com), we do not report to any public databases—therefore, such checking is safe.

We provide a plagiarism-free guarantee that ensures your paper is always checked for its uniqueness.

Is there a money-back guarantee? If yes, how can I receive a refund?

You can certainly get your money back in several cases. You can receive a full refund if you have paid for your order twice or if you have placed two identical orders. In case your paper was late or the quality of the paper does not correspond to your expectations, you will get compensation for these issues.

Do you keep a database of pre-written essays?

No, we do not have such a database. All papers you order from us are written from scratch. This means your paper is unique and has never been published before—neither will it be published after we deliver it to you.

 

When will my custom paper be done?

While placing an order with WritersHub, you can choose a period of time within which a paper should be delivered to you. The countdown until the specified deadline starts automatically from the moment we receive your payment in our system. For example, if you pay for your order at 6pm on Monday and choose a 3-day delivery option, you will receive your custom paper by 6pm on Thursday.

Remember that a writer needs a sufficient amount of time in order to conduct thorough research. Therefore, please choose the most suitable deadline when you place an order. Moreover, the later you need your paper to be delivered to you, the cheaper it will be. Thus, you will be able to save your money while your writer will have enough time to work on your order and ensure its quality.

Make sure you upload all the additional materials at the very beginning. If you fail to do that, the deadline for your order will be postponed as well.

I haven’t received my custom paper by the deadline. What should I do?

Let us know immediately about that. You can do it by writing a message on Facebook or email us. Our support manager will carefully examine your order and will assist you with it right away. The reasons for late delivery may vary from time to time. It can happen that you have entered a wrong email address or your spam filter does not allow you to receive emails from us. It is also possible that the writer is waiting for your reply and can not continue working without your assistance, or we are checking the work for plagiarism. Whatever the case may be, contact us if you have any problems with getting your order on time.